Chapter 1
The Problem and Its Background
1.1
Introduction
Bullying today had been very common.
Students are the usualvictims and suspects of such. A very familiar yet
unobvious type of bullying is taking place not by means of physical touch nor
verbal interaction but in a place we call internet.
The term for this is cyber bullying
wherein it involves social media and monitor to monitor interaction. It is
different from any type of bullying because instead of using body parts and
tounge, the bully often uses keyboards or any other typing materials to deliver
or send an offending message to his or her person to bully.
Cyber bullying is a rampant issue in many
people because of the unconsciousness on it. Examples of cyber bullying include
mean text messages or emails, rumors sent by electronic mail or posted on
social networking sites, and embarerasing pictures, videos, websites or making
fake profiles.
Cyber bullying has this impact we call
Psychological impact. In which it has a huge effect. It remains on the person
as a bad memory thus can affect his or her performance and self esteem. It can
affect his or her view on things.
1.2
Theoretical Framework
Theories of
Aggressive Behavior
Sheri Bauman
As
cyberbullying is a form of aggression, it is helpful to briefly review the
major theories of aggressive behavior. This chapter gives the reader a basic
familiarity with the various theoretical positions. Aggression can be either
instrumental, or proactive (deliberate, designed to achieve a goal); or
reactive (impulsive aggressive response to a real or perceived attack). There
are three major views of aggression: it is an instinct that is inborn, it is a
response to accumulated frustration of drive satisfaction, and it is learned
via modeling and observation and is reinforced (social learning). Social
information processing theory proposes a six-step process by which children and
youths cognitively process social cues: encoding, interpreting, clarifying
goals, generating response options, deciding on an option, and enacting the
chosen behavior. The also discusses moral disengagement, the Bandura's social
cognitive theory; attribution theory and the role of bystanders.
Espelage,
D. L., Rao, M. A., & Craven, R. (2012). Theories of cyberbullying. In S.
Bauman, D. Cross, & J. L. Walker (Eds.), Principles of Cyberbullying Research: Definitions, Measures, and
Methodology (pp. 49-67).
Abstract
Despite the mounting volume of research in
the area of traditional forms of bullying (ie. verbal, physical, relational)
that are transmitted face to face, cyberbullying research is only recently
beginning to burgeon. To date, the cyberbullying literature has included
studies examining the prevalence of cyberbullying among youth, how these
prevalence estimates differ across demographic factors (eg. sex, race),
investigating the overlap between face-to-face bullying and cyberbullying, and
identifying predictors of cyberbullying involvement. However, discussions of
explanatory theories of cyberbullying involvement among youth are sparse and
piecemeal, and conclusions have been based largely on cross-sectional studies.
The goals of this chapter are threefold. First, we review numerous theories
that have been empirically supported in the aggression, bullying, and general
social development literature that might offer some promise in understanding
cyberbullying. These theories range from the comprehensive social ecological
framework to more specific theories related to communication, social norms, and
social learning. Second, a series of longitudinal analyses are presented to
evaluate the transactional association between face-to-face bullying
perpetration and cyberbullying perpetration, and the reciprocal interaction
between cyberbullying victimization and perpetration. Third, self-concept
theory and research is summarized to highlight how theory could inform
prevention efforts.
PERCEPTION
|
1.3
Conceptual
Framework
The
researchers apply a framework that would show the direct effect of cyber
bullying to the audience particularly the teenagers. Also, the primary variable
in this framework is the psychological effect of Cyber bullying which can
directly affect the audience. We used the I-P-O diagram to show conceptual framework.
Psychological
Impact and the mental effect of cyber bullying to the student’s self
confidence.
|
Its effects
to Academic Performance of SHS students.
|
Cyber
bullying to the Senior High School students
|
Figure 1: Conceptual
Framework Diagram
1.4.1
Statement
of the Problem
1.What
is cyberbullying?
2.Why should cyber bullying considered as a
crime?
3.How to avoid this kind of bullying?
4.What should be the effect of cyberbullying
on the senior high school students?
General
Objective
Generally, the purpose of this study is to determine the The Psychological Impact of
Cyberbullying on Self Confidence to the selected Senior High School Students
1.4.2
Specific
Objectives
The
study specifically aimed to:
1. To
determine the effects of the
Psychological Impact of Cyberbullying on Self Confidence to the selected Senior
High School Students
2. To
acquaint teenagers on to effects of cyber bullying to students and its long
term effect
1.5
Scope
and Delimitation
This
study focused on The
Psychological Impact of Cyberbullying on Self Confidence to the selected Senior
High School Students. It also focused on how television cyber
bullying influence the audience, the teenagers in particular. The researchers
prudently considered the factors that this study is apt to the high school
student as the relevant subject of this study.
The
researchers decided to choose the senior high school students of Arellano University
ages 17-19 because they are a convenient example and respondent.
1.6
Significance
of the Study
The significance of this
study is that it is about cyber bullying and its psychological impact including
the effect on the self confidence to the senior high school students.
This study is important and it’s
significance is the knowledge that it can bring to the table for the students
about how cyber bullying affects them thus giving them proper awareness. This
study derves as a future reference also for other researchers.
1.7
Definition
of Terms
Behaviour- range of actions and mannerisms made by
individuals
Cyber bullying-is a form of bullying using electronic
forms of contact
Cyber Space- virtual word
Emerge- sudden continual existence
Envy- lacks another's superior quality
Keyboard warrior- an offensive typer
Intolerance-perceive
Chapter II
Review of Literature
2.1 Research Literature
2.1.1 Emerging Cyber bullying
According to Mesch (2009) cyberbullying emerges most commonly from
relationship problems (break-ups, envy, intolerance, and ganging up); victims
experience powerfully negative effects (especially on their social well-being);
and the reactive behavior from schools and students is generally inappropriate,
absent, or ineffective.
2.1.2 Significance of
Cyberbullying
There is a significant correlation between becoming a cybervictim and
loneliness among adolescents according to Sahin (2012). Studies show that
electronic bullying peaks in middle school. Two studies conducted by Smith,
et.al (2008) found cyberbullying less frequent than traditional bullying, but
appreciable, and reported more outside of school than inside.
2.1.3 Effects of Cyber Bullying
Cyber bullying affects people from any age or walk of life,
including children, teens and adults who all
feel very distressed and alone when being bullied
online. Cyber bullying can make you feel totally overwhelmed which
can result in many feeling embarrassed that they are going through such a
devastating time, and not knowing what support is available to them.
Many children feel unable to confide in an adult because they feel
ashamed and wonder whether they will be judged, told to ignore
it or close their account which they might not want to
do.
2.1.4 Increased
Emotional Distress
Typical and immediate
responses to being victimized by a cyberbully include anger, frustration, and
sadness. Usually, the degree of problems offline is directly proportional to
how much bullying behavior is experienced online. Victims of cyberbullying are
often stressed – making it difficult for them to identify where the harmful
online behavior is coming from. In the victim’s distress, these bullies can
easily obfuscate their movements by creating several social media accounts and
personas in order to hide their identities, as well as make it seem as though
the victim is disliked by many as opposed to just one person.
2.1.5 Cyber Bullying compared to
other type of bullying
Just as acts of violence …jeopardizes
the intent of the school to be free of aggression against persons or
property…disruptions, and disorder (Center for the Prevention of
School Violence, 2000, p. 2), cyber bullying and textual harassment are equally
disruptive and threatening. In fact, cyber bullying can be worse than the
traditional school yard variety because a cyber bully can remain anonymous by
posting unsigned attacks on his/her online social network. Although Liza
Belkin, 2010, was referring to parents of young children her comments are just
as important in this text. She reports that "[the] anonymity of the
Internet has a way of bringing out the harsh, judgmental streak in strangers
who would never belittle another… in person."
No comments:
Post a Comment